Maybe we should forget the psychological babble and just tell it as it is. Here are the basic facts. ( in my humble opinion.)
An evil person came into Stacey Burns’ house early in the morning of Mothers’ Day, 2009 with the intent to kill. This person obviously was successful as Stacey Burns is dead. He or she used a method of execution that was as personal as it was vicious. Five years later, this person continues to walk free and with each passing day, the heinousness of the crime fades in memory. There are those who are waiting for the killer to either come forward or to make a mistake. The investigation is not active because the police believe they know who killed Stacey Burns and are not willing to look at alternatives. Finally, this should not be an unsolved case simply because it is so self-contained. There must be a gaping hole in the prosecutor’s case, a hole that could jeopardize his chances of success in his prosecution of the killer.
If you have an 85% chance of conviction, take it, Mr. Prosecutor, and show how competent you can be. Bring things out in the open. Maybe it will shake something loose. Otherwise, we’ll be looking at this case showing up on a television program twenty five years down the road with anyone still alive wondering where the justice went.
My next post will return to asking questions that no one seems to want to address or even dismiss as ridiculous.
They (prosecuters & other legal experts) love to use to excuse ,”we only have one shot, if we can’t convince a jury byond a reasonable doubt this psychopath will walk free forever” It’s like thay have no trust in any jury, like jurys are the dumbest people in the world. First of all thats a lie, all they need to do is convince ONE person in 12 and they can try the whole thing over. Just look at how the Mcleod case went !! when it looked like the jury was going to aquit the judge stepped in after only 8 hours of deliberation and declared a “MISTRIAL”.
Most people that insert themselves into the middle of these kind of cases are usually involved to some extent. Even IF not the killer they could be associated with or even have hired the person who committed these heinous crimes. All these aspects cloud the waters and add to speculation beyond the stretches of the case.
Or they care
~ THANK YOU DUKE FOR KEEPING STACEYS MEMORY ALIVE EVERY DAY…….
even if just here on this blog…
~ See you been fishin Jim ;o)
nice to see you passionate as always,but centered and calm.
and caring, as always. sweet dreams to you.
~ Mr John Smith…….
you sound as if you know a lot about this case that you are not sharing here…….
you seem motivated to point a finger at JV… how can you be so SURE???
personally i don’t believe he nor Ed did it.
its so obvious that they would immediately blame each other. anyone else may have easily commited the perfect murder.
could it be you???
Most people who use fake names have something serious to hide. What are you not wanting to share and why???
And when are you going to open a bank account REWARD FOR INFO LEADING TO ARREST & CONVICTION of STACEY BURNS??? I will match your opening deposit and double it within 90 days.Lets go!!!
I dont believe Jim did this he loved her.To vicious and i havent heard any thing good about the x but dont believe cowards would do that a man beating a wife is along way from a daring one . I will always believe a woman until proven different. I feel that it is someone well liked by teens young adults not so much by adult woman was probably attractive when younger not so much now . Friendly but not really. Could be an active health nut .Alot of built up rage and anger over lifetime that very few people have seen and no i dont have any one in mind nor do i suspect anyone. O ya very strong with a winning smile one word comes to mind .DEVIOUS