Ironically, three weeks from today is designated as School Nurse Day. One week later will be the eighth anniversary of Stacey Burns’ last day on the planet.
Here are portions of another email I received in response to my “Admissable/Inadmissable” blog post. It explains some aspects of the dilemma regarding evidence required for a case to go to court.
I’d only call attention to line 1, which mentions an open case. So, does this place the murder of Stacey Burns in the open-unsolved category and not the cold case category? The mention of a team in the sixth line would seem to indicate this.
I think we all understand the examples of inadmissible evidence mentioned below. However, this does not rule out the possibility that some evidence in the Burns case may not be admissible because of issues with collection. As stated in line one, some questions can not be addressed/answered in and open case. So, we will not know what evidence there is until this case is brought to court.
For now, we can only remember Stacey Burns on School Nurse Day, and then, one week later, on the anniversary of her death, and pray that her killer is caught sooner rather than later.
Here are a few sections of the email.
Some questions can not be answered/addressed in an open case.
In every criminal case, there is admissible and inadmissible evidence.
The fact that every case has inadmissible evidence does not mean that it was illegally obtained or there is a problem with it.
Evidence is inadmissible for many reasons that have nothing to do with how it was collected typically based on the rules of evidence.
Example: (Hearsay, Privileged, Confidential Documents, and Certain Communications).
The Stacey Ann Keane Burns case will continue to be staffed with a Team from…
1. The NH Attorney General’s Office
2. The State Police Major Crime Unit
3. The NH Cold Case Unit
I think about Stacey every day not just on school nurse day or her anniversary. I mean EVERY day and will until this is solved. Something that affects your family in such a way is always at the forefront of your mind.
Maybe Stacey Burns was afraid of Ed Burn’s reaction because of what the lawyers were doing to Ed under the deception that this was coming from Stacey. My former wife made accusations against me that I was a potential threat to not only abuse her, but to also be a threat to abuse her friends, family, co-workers AND CHILDREN! This only occurred AFTER attorney Walker learned of my former wife violating her restraining order by repeatedly contacting me and feeding me information about attorney Walker and his illegal and unethical practices involving property we owned (unethically obtained information through both my lawyers who are also being protected!). What made these malicious accusations against me even more incredible was that my former wife was being very friendly towards me at the time and had approached me wanting to stop the divorce proceedings.
If you are familiar with Stanley Milgram’s electric shock experiment (Yale) in the 1960’s you would know that most people are obedient to authority. They will administer what amounts to torture when doing so under the direction of an authoritative figure. Attorney Walker is president of the most powerful law firm in Carroll County and this firm has presided over the Carroll county courts since the 1970’s (ended in 2014). My former wife was being “submissive” to attorney Walker as I suspect Stacey Burns was being submissive to her lawyer that was subordinate to attorney Walker.
I liken what occurred to me to a character assassination and a financial and emotional “gang rape”; and both my lawyers were participating. Ed Burn’s lawyer’s license to practice was suspended 3 weeks after Stacey’s murder and rest assured that was no coincidence. There is an illegal and unethical role being practiced in New Hampshire involving family law and both Ed Burn’s and I were victims of this role. Every lawyer, judge and politician worth their weight in salt is familiar with this role so it is not well hidden. Even if Ed Burn’s is guilty of murdering Stacey Burn’s he likely cannot be prosecuted for 1st degree murder. To prosecute Ed Burns for 1st degree murder would also mean prosecuting these lawyers and exposing this corruption to the people of New Hampshire and the country. Be assured that attorney Walker knows this too and if he is involved directly with Stacey Burn’s and/or Roberta Miller’s murder, he is being protected similar to the protection the pedophile priests enjoyed from the Vatican before the fall.
For the record Jim Vittum and Ed Burn’s you are also victims (assuming neither of you are the degenerate scum bag that killed her) . If and when the truth is exposed you will be entitled to sue these lawyers, the NHBA and possibly the state of New Hampshire as well. The term “Willful Negligence” paints a wide swath. However, you will likely have to go outside New England in order to get a lawyer willing to take on this law suit. As for my fate: I am well aware the NHBA lawyer’s, judges and politicians would rather chew glass than ever give me any chance at justice or financial compensation for the damage they caused my life and that of my children. I will seek my justice at a much higher level.
By the way Jamie Vittum. There is a witness to you meeting with your x husband in the woods. And it has been substantiated.
I have also looked into you. In your last post, it looks to be that you yourself had an moment. Doctors would all that ” Polar Disorder”.
According to my favorite suspect, who you should know, she quoted as “Jim should fix his teeth and trim his mustache”. This was after his interview on VH1. That is where my statement came from.
I find it very offensive that you would attack me in your post. You need to be more honest.
Also know that I am a respected member of the community and know more than you will ever know. Even your cover ups. If this horrible crime happened in your family? You would be all over it.
Furthermore, Jim Vittum was denied a weapons permit by the court of Carrol County. Why? Because he is unstable. When you are denied a permit do you believe that you can now carry? You’re in deep doodoo!
Further more. Where did the money go?
You were in a divorce situation yourself. So you mention that you know more about Stacey and her situation with Ed? When your husband was actually purported to be in a relationship with Stacey? Also you claim to be her friend?
You see, as I’ve stated before, some try to change, but just can’t. Because they can not escape their past.